User talk:Severian - Revision history

LordMortiferus at 06:35, 8 May 2012

2012-05-08T06:35:14Z

Severian: alright .... what to do next ... hmm

2010-03-19T08:54:08Z

alright .... what to do next ... hmm

Eggmceye at 07:46, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T07:46:07Z

Eggmceye at 07:45, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T07:45:06Z

Severian: noted ... but

2010-03-18T22:18:06Z

noted ... but

Eggmceye at 22:02, 18 March 2010

2010-03-18T22:02:28Z

Severian: added a question

2010-03-18T02:41:48Z

added a question

Severian at 05:22, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T05:22:41Z

Eggmceye at 12:15, 16 March 2010

2010-03-16T12:15:43Z

Severian: a note on weaponsmithing

2010-03-16T10:20:47Z

a note on weaponsmithing

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 8 May 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Questions:		Questions:
		+
		+
		+	Thanks Sev for going through the [[Creating Avatars]] section.--[[User:LordMortiferus\|LordMortiferus]] 06:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 19 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Summary Recent of Changes:		Summary Recent of Changes:

−	~~18/03/10: added a (simple) question~~
−	~~17/03/10: updated class/misc skills sections and combat page as planned; moved question/suggestion to forum.~~


Line 14:		Line 12:

	Questions:		Questions:
−
−	~~- Do critical hits do double damage? If not, how much do they do relative to a regular hit?~~
−
−	~~they don't do double but the do more than normal - i mean every one knows what a 'critical hit is' ^.^ --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)~~
−
−	yes, but you quantified the damage done with special rage attacks (at more than 25% and more than 60%) ... just thought criticals should be similarly quantified. (btw, when you have time, please log to so we can have a chat ... i have a slight revision to the suggestion i made about tactics and weapon skill synergies)
−
−	Hmm well that's true, but 1.5x dmg and double dmg is easy to say and remember. The formula for critical is like +30d2 for u/a and +20d2 for everything else but really, that isn't worth putting in - might as well put every other formula in too. --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 07:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
−
−	~~plus it's important to preserve some mystique - ie keep some mystery about it~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 19 March 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Hmm well that's true, but 1.5x dmg and double dmg is easy to say and remember. The formula for critical is like +30d2 for u/a and +20d2 for everything else but really, that isn't worth putting in - might as well put every other formula in too. --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 07:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)		Hmm well that's true, but 1.5x dmg and double dmg is easy to say and remember. The formula for critical is like +30d2 for u/a and +20d2 for everything else but really, that isn't worth putting in - might as well put every other formula in too. --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 07:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	plus it's important to preserve some mystique - ie keep some mystery about it

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 19 March 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	yes, but you quantified the damage done with special rage attacks (at more than 25% and more than 60%) ... just thought criticals should be similarly quantified. (btw, when you have time, please log to so we can have a chat ... i have a slight revision to the suggestion i made about tactics and weapon skill synergies)		yes, but you quantified the damage done with special rage attacks (at more than 25% and more than 60%) ... just thought criticals should be similarly quantified. (btw, when you have time, please log to so we can have a chat ... i have a slight revision to the suggestion i made about tactics and weapon skill synergies)
		+
		+	Hmm well that's true, but 1.5x dmg and double dmg is easy to say and remember. The formula for critical is like +30d2 for u/a and +20d2 for everything else but really, that isn't worth putting in - might as well put every other formula in too. --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 07:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 18 March 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	they don't do double but the do more than normal - i mean every one knows what a 'critical hit is' ^.^ --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)		they don't do double but the do more than normal - i mean every one knows what a 'critical hit is' ^.^ --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	yes, but you quantified the damage done with special rage attacks (at more than 25% and more than 60%) ... just thought criticals should be similarly quantified. (btw, when you have time, please log to so we can have a chat ... i have a slight revision to the suggestion i made about tactics and weapon skill synergies)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 18 March 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:

	- Do critical hits do double damage? If not, how much do they do relative to a regular hit?		- Do critical hits do double damage? If not, how much do they do relative to a regular hit?
		+
		+	they don't do double but the do more than normal - i mean every one knows what a 'critical hit is' ^.^ --[[User:Eggmceye\|Eggmceye]] 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Summary Recent of Changes:
 /03/10: updated class/misc skills sections and combat page as planned; moved question/suggestion to forum.
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 Questions:
-None atm ...
+- Do critical hits do double damage? If not, how much do they do relative to a regular hit?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Summary of Changes:
+Summary Recent of Changes:
-/03/10:
+/03/10: updated class/misc skills sections and combat page as planned; moved question/suggestion to forum.
-- Yet another question (YAQ), or rather, a note on weaponsmithing added.
 To Do List:
 Fix the Items page:
@@ Line 25: / Line 14: @@
 Questions:
-* For weaponsmithing, the following currently applies:
+None atm ...
-** to get 80-82, weapons required: gold +4/+5, copper/silver +4/+5, venomous +3/+4/+5
-** for 82-84: gold +5, copper/silver +4/+5, venomous +3/+4/+5
-** for 84-87: gold +5, copper/silver +4/+5, venomous +4/+5
-** for 87-90: gold +5, copper/silver +5, venomous +4/+5
-** for 90-92: copper/silver +5, venomous +4/+5
-** for 92-95: copper/silver +5, venomous +5
-** for 95-100: venomous +5
-−
-As you can see, the material requirements to GM this skill are extremely difficult to obtain. Not only are many magical weapons required, but they must also be tinted. Isn't this a tad too difficult?
-−
-I urge you to allow plain +6 (and perhaps even +7) weapons to be craftable (and deconstructable) to ease the difficulty.
-−
-doesn't that belong in the forum ??

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 16 March 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:

	I urge you to allow plain +6 (and perhaps even +7) weapons to be craftable (and deconstructable) to ease the difficulty.		I urge you to allow plain +6 (and perhaps even +7) weapons to be craftable (and deconstructable) to ease the difficulty.
		+
		+	doesn't that belong in the forum ??

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Summary of Changes:
 /03/10:
-- Changed the Miscellaneous Skills to mimick changes made to the Class Skills page.
+- Yet another question (YAQ), or rather, a note on weaponsmithing added.
-- Added questions Q5 and Q6 (below).
-−
-/03/10:
-- Changed the Class Skills page as discussed.
-- Added several categories to my talk page for a plan and (more) descriptive log of changes I have or intend to make.
@@ Line 18: / Line 13: @@
 Fix the Combat page:
-* Rename and re-write the section on "Special Moves" (to "Special Rage Attacks" - as referenced in the class skills page) ... I WILL DO THIS NEXT - SOME TIME TODAY ...
+* Rename and re-write the section on "Special Moves" (to "Special Rage Attacks" - as referenced in the class skills page)
 * Remove material on skill specific special moves, that info will be on the skills pages along with the relevent skills. Instead, there will be links to this info on the combat page.
 * Remove info on "abilities" (including passive ones like dodge) to the Miscellaneous Skills (and abilities) page. And again, add the links.
@@ Line 30: / Line 25: @@
 Questions:
-'''(5) Do priests have the same armour benefits that fighters do? If not, do they have any armour benefits at all?'''<br>
+As you can see, the material requirements to GM this skill are extremely difficult to obtain. Not only are many magical weapons required, but they must also be tinted. Isn't this a tad too difficult?
-priests can benefit from medium and heavy armour<br>
-if you open weapons.txt in excel, the classes column shows the classes that can benefit from this armour
-−
-'''(6) Fighters and Priests have no movement penalties when wearing light and medium armour What of rogues?'''<br>
-they don't get movement penalty from light but med+ will slow them down. f & p aren't slowed by medium.
-−
-'''And are the heavy armour penalties the same for all classes? ''' <br>
-h-orcs are not slowed by heavy.
-−
-'''Do individual pieces of each category count uniformly to the overall movement penalty or is the movement penalty weighted by for example the weight of the particular item?'''<br>
-gee I dunno ! not worth documenting
-−
-'''(7) Can each character only fish up ONE pair of dragonscale boots? How come? And can one character only get one adamantium fishing rod drop?'''<br>
-yes 1 per char since they are so good and its easy to get them now and I dont want 500 pairs of ds boots on merchs. addy fish pole drop is just rare. '1 pair of boots each' does not need to go in manual
-−
-'''(8) Are all the tint bonuses as listed on the [[Item_Materials]] page accurate (and in particular the bonuses for copper items)?'''<br>
-copper has some minor errors - I will fix it myself and will chk the others
-−
-'''(9) What exactly raises tactics? Currently, the [[Class_Skills]] page says that tactics "...increases when attacking with any fighter weapon or while Unarmed". Is that complete and accurate?'''<br>
-yes this is perfectly accurate
-'''(10) Can you still make gold nuggets using gold as the manual suggests?'''<br>
+I urge you to allow plain +6 (and perhaps even +7) weapons to be craftable (and deconstructable) to ease the difficulty.
-nope! this is wrong